TOPOGRAPHY, SITE AND PRE-EXISTENCES.
Like the allotment Museros 1, it is placed in the same zone of enlargement, no sooner in front of the former one, and separate both for a street. Having the same characteristics of the environment both of them: the way of the train, the high step of the road in Naquera, antique road of Barcelona and peripheral industrial plants near the antique kernel that have stayed after the new housing development imprisoned. In this case we find in front of the scalextric of the high step of the road of Naquera that it finds to the ours back. The most rectangular, proportionate and neighbouring allotment, in the Unit of execution, gives us cause for experimenting and putting in crisis about the previous performances. Being in this very similar case to the previous ones, and not with the length and curvature that there was in Museros 1.
PROGRAM
We repeat the hypotheses of entry: given the price of the allotment, the inexperience of the promoters, to take out the maximum of housings of three bedrooms in a variable fork among 95 and 130 square meters. All housings had to have particular terrace of more than 15 m2. Besides community services how it is swimming pool and garage of a post for housing, at least. Price of exit market: 1500 € /m2. In particular it consists to replaying the services of high standing that are produced in Valencia, from a prospect of accessibility to normal people, medium economic standard low.
FORMAL AND THEORETICAL CONCEPTUALIZATION. Pagoda + Architecture povera.
The ordinances of the sector forced from the second to moving back four meters of the zone of public avenue. Precept that yes here, we fulfilled. The structure, but it remained to be part of the composition. This intervention acts, equal that the Museros 1, with cadence of installations from contrast, non analogy. We have intended to be a research among the vedettista architecture. In spite of the budgetary disability. While attempting, again, to tuck in the more with the minimum. Covering the requirement that standing would be wished by the height with respect to contributions to the final user. That is, the mimetic solution has been rejected, to be like this conscious of our excluding the possibility to minimize the impact in the existing context. Anti rhetoric. Materials and standard qualities, but well constructed and executed. Which merit of the constructor is. The vital interaction among community inside of the housing and the requirements.
COMPOSITION.
This intervention follows the trace of the previous interventions that seemed military barracks. Investing the terms creating another wantedly different artefact from the composition. A cube stands up and is covered by a covered curve that the perimeter exempt pillars bear. The kernel of vertical communication remains as a result of facade. Capital sin in every commercial design. The façade is very expensive, they say the promoters. Everything organizes itself symmetrically. Evident contradiction in an oriental concept. And wantedly Asian of outer image. In all cases the distribution is an inferior floor as diurnal zone and the upper one night. Two housings for each floor, and community use to everybody. The insertion of canopy in the access remembers the Thorium of the ways of Japan. Pillars and beams it allows the possibility of installations awning of Mediterranean root. Mediterranean and oriental mixture. Unfortunately and unilaterally one of the promoters was castles in it took out it of colours of the portam and of the ornament destroying all concepts that had meditated on it. The result is clearly divergent with the devised one, turning the conception upside down constitutes an act of lack training. With a sentence that pushed, one of the promoting partners, he finished the tirade: “A hospital seems with this colours”. By Now, already spreading the fashion of these colours, it seems that we will be able to develop some piece of this look. The badly it is already irreversible.